David MOUREY Professeur d'Economie Auteurs de nombreux ouvrages d'économie chez De Boeck Fondateur des « Rencontres économiques » depuis 2005.« Rencontres économiques lycéennes » et « Rencontres économiques citoyennes »à Pontault-Combault depuis 2005 ! Fondateur des« Rencontres économiques » à Paris depuis 2008 !
History of the Commission
The Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission was created to "examine the causes, domestic and global, of the current financial and economic crisis in the United States."
The Commission was established as part of the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act (Public Law 111-21) passed by Congress and signed by the President in May 2009.
This independent, 10-member panel was composed of private citizens with experience in areas such as housing, economics, finance, market regulation, banking and consumer protection.
Six members of the Commission were appointed by the Democratic leadership of Congress and four by the Republican leadership.
The Commission’s statutory instructions set out 22 specific topics for inquiry and called for the examination of the collapse of major financial institutions that failed or would have failed if not for exceptional assistance from the government.
Work of the Commission
This work of the Commission was intended to provide a historical accounting of what brought our financial system and economy to a precipice and to help policy makers and the public better understand how it came to be.
The Commission’s statutory instructions set out 22 specific topics for inquiry and called for the examination of the collapse of major financial institutions that failed or would have failed if not for exceptional assistance from the government. The Commission’s report fulfilled these mandates.
In addition, the Commission was instructed to refer to the attorney general of the United States and any appropriate state attorney general any person that the Commission found may have violated the laws of the United States in relation to the crisis. Where the Commission found such potential violations, it referred those matters to the appropriate authorities. The Commission used the authority it was given to issue subpoenas to compel testimony and the production of documents, but in the vast majority of instances, companies and individuals voluntarily cooperated with this inquiry.
In the course of its research and investigation, the Commission reviewed millions of pages of documents, interviewed more than 700 witnesses, and held 19 days of public hearings in New York, Washington, D.C., and communities across the country that were hard hit by the crisis.
The Commission also drew from a large body of existing work about the crisis developed by congressional committees, government agencies, academics, journalists, legal investigators, and many others.
The Commission conducted research into broad and sometimes arcane subjects, such as mortgage lending and securitization, derivatives, corporate governance, and risk management. To bring these subjects out of the realm of the abstract, it conducted case study investigations of specific financial firms—and in many cases specific facets of these institutions—that played pivotal roles.
Those institutions included American International Group (AIG), Bear Stearns, Citigroup, Countrywide Financial, Fannie Mae, Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, Moody’s, and Wachovia. The Commission also looked more generally at the roles and actions of scores of other companies.
The Commission also studied relevant policies put in place by successive Congresses and administrations.
It also examined the roles of policy makers and regulators, including at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (and its successor, the Federal Housing Finance Agency), the Office of Thrift Supervision, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Treasury Department.
The Commission’s hope is that readers can use its work
to reach their own conclusions,
even as the comprehensive historical record of this crisis
continues to be written.
Conclusions of the Commission
The Commission concluded that this crisis was avoidable—the result of human actions, inactions, and misjudgments. Warnings were ignored.
It found widespread failures in financial regulation; dramatic breakdowns in corporate governance; excessive borrowing and risk-taking by households and Wall Street; policy makers who were ill prepared for the crisis; and systemic breaches in accountability and ethics at all levels.
How did it come to pass that in 2008 our nation was forced to choose between two stark and painful alternatives — either risk the collapse of our financial system and economy, or commit trillions of taxpayer dollars to rescue major corporations and our financial markets, as millions of Americans still lost their jobs, their savings, and their homes ?
Here we present what we found so readers can reach their own conclusions, even as the comprehensive historical record of this crisis continues to be written.
“The greatest tragedy would be to accept the refrain
that no one could have seen this coming
and thus nothing could have been done.
If we accept this notion, it will happen again.”
GET THE REPORT
To view the report of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, you can download the report in full or download a section of the report by clicking on the links below.
Download Full Report with Dissents (PDF)
Conclusions of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
Part I: Crisis on the Horizon
Part II: Setting the Stage
Part III: The Boom and Bust
Part IV: The Unraveling
Part V: The Aftershocks
Dissenting Views By Keith Hennessey, Douglas Holtz-Eakin, and Bill Thomas
Dissenting Views By Peter J. Wallison
Appendix B: List of Hearings and Witnesses